Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-03-2013 CDC Minutes MINUTES OF THE MISSION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE April 3, 2013 The Mission Community Development Committee met at Mission City Hall, Wednesday, April 3, 2013 at 6:30 p.m. with Councilmember Suzie Gibbs presiding. The following committee members were present: Lawrence Andre, Jennifer Cowdry, and Will Vandenberg. Councilmember Gibbs called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. Also present were City Councilmembers Pat Quinn, Amy Miller, Debbie Kring, and Dave Shepard, and Assistant City Administrator/Finance Director Laura Smith, City Clerk Martha Sumrall, Community Development/Neighborhood Services Director Martin Rivarola, Parks & Recreation Director Christy Humerickhouse, Project Manager Justin Pregont, City Attorney David Martin, and City Land Use Attorney Pete Heaven. Resolution Approving 2014-2018 CARS Project List Mr. Pregont stated that the proposed resolution is a routine, procedural matter that is required by the CARS program for funding of projects. This resolution includes a table detailing the scope of work and total estimated budget for each project submitted to CARS for the next five years. He stated that this resolution is non-binding and used primarily as a planning tool. Changes may be made to project in future years, and he provided several examples. Councilmember Andre stated that he supports this document as a planning tool, but has concerns with how these proposed projects line-up with the CIP. Ms. Smith stated that a clause has been added to the resolution stating the the "submission of the 2014-18 CARS program does not specifically commit any expenditures on behalf of the City of Mission." Councilmember Kring commented that because Mission has been so proactive in moving forward with street projects, we have moved several to the "top of the list." Discussion continued on the costs associated with the proposed CARS projects, specifically that the estimates are more accurate than in past years and include ancillary costs. Councilmember Miller questioned whether these projects tie into the CIP. Ms. Smith stated that they reflect the CIP and that there is time to plan for these in the coming years. She stated that we fund only year 1 of the CIP. Councilmember Andre recommended that the resolution approving a five-year City/County Street Improvement Program be forwarded to Council for approval. All on the committee agreed. This will be a consent agenda item. Municipal Outdoor Pool Project Ms. Smith provided Council with handouts detailing the Municipal Outdoor Pool project design considerations that our Design Team is working with, several renderings of the possible pool design, and current information on specific proposed design elements in relation to the current pool. She stated that this item is for discussion only and no action is required at this MINUTES OF THE MISSION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE April 3, 2013 time. The second public meeting on the new aquatics facility will be held on April 4th at the Community Center. Mark Clayton discussed the nine priorities that were provided to the Design Team, and the input received from attendees at the first public meeting, all of which provided the basis for the initial design presented. He presented a site plan and discussed the following specifics of the plan: • Competition pool with a diving area • Renovation of the current bath house • Maintaining a "construction zone area" on the north side of the pool for future Rock Creek improvements • New filter building • Adding 25-30 parking spaces • Spray Pad • Leisure Pool • Dual flume slide • Concrete bleachers • Shade structures Discussion continued on the specific amenities proposed, with it being noted that the footprint for the proposed new facility is relatively the same as the current pool. Councilmember Vandenberg requested information on the cost of slides, which are approximately $280,000 for the two flume slide. Councilember Cowdry questioned whether this proposed pool design is in the $4.4 million range. Ms. Smith stated that this budget is being kept in mind and respected. Discussion continued on alternative features for the pool that can be added or taken away, anticipated operating costs and whether they can be accurately estimated at this time (without a final pool design), current "bather loads" for pool vs. those for the new facility, the economics of renovating the current bath house vs. building a new one, and maintenance and durability expectations of pool amenities. It was noted that the proposed additional parking will allow the drop-off of swimmers off-street and these spaces can be used when the pool is closed for additional City Hall/Municipal Court parking (possibly funded by sources other than the Parks & Recreation sales tax). The committee also discussed an updated filtration system (6-7 pumps) for the new facility that will be separate for each pool, and new ultraviolet filtration technology that will be utilized reducing the risk of "crypto" contamination. Discussion also continued on ADA requirements, the number of lifeguards that would be required for the proposed pool design (lifeguard requirements are based on the size of pool area and not the number of pools), and the anticipated longevity of pools now being built. Councilmember Miller expressed her concerns with the splash pad area location on the east side of the pool and suggested that the design be `flipped" to have the splash pad closer to the MINUTES OF THE MISSION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE April 3, 2013 open park area for greater usage and better proximity to the playground during the months when the pool itself is closed. The Design Team discussed the desire to keep pool and amenities for younger children together, and to have the pool(s) with the shallowest water at the front of the facility and the deepest water at the back. They also discussed the natural/grading challenges on the site and the desire to keep as many shade trees in the park as possible. Councilmember Andre asked that as the plan moves forward, pedestrian access to the entire site be considered, including a sidewalk that would loop around the facility/park, connecting the spray ground to the park. As part of the discussion on "flipping" the design, improvements to the bath house were discussed including whether or not building a new bathhouse would be economically feasible and possibly assist with changing the proposed layout of the facility. It was noted by the Design Team, that the current bath house was built in 1988 and is in great shape so it would be wise to renovate it. A diagram of the redesigned/renovated bath house was presented and explained. Councilmember Andre stated that if the spray park remains near City Hall, the design should be enhanced to "provide a sense of place" for this amenity, including benches, etc. Councilmember Shepard stated that the second public presentation on the New Outdoor Pool would be tomorrow, April 4th at 6:30 p.m. at the Community Center. This item was for discussion only and no action was taken. Johnson Drive ROW/Easement Acquisition Process Mr. Pregont stated that Federal funding associated with this project mandates that the City pay property owners for ROW and easements. A specific appraisal and acquisition process is being followed for this which meets Federal requirements. Offer letters have been delivered to property owners and the process is currently underway. Mr. Heaven provided information on the steps required by Federal law, including an individual appraisal for each easement, followed by a second appraisal, with the offer made being the higher of the two appraisals. Face-to-face meetings with property owners have begun and once easements have been signed, these will be brought to Council as a group for approval. Discussion continued on the County's appraised value vs. independent appraisals, permanent vs. temporary construction easements, and the need to "clean-up" right-of-way issues along Johnson Drive. Council also discussed the location of the permanent easements (building to curb). Mr. Heaven noted that an interruption of business due to construction is not compensable under Federal law, although it is a concern to some business owners. Councilmember Miller stated that she has been approached by businesses who are concerned that this process is taking place at a time when property values have depreciated. It was noted that the Johnson County appraisal has nothing to do with this and that the appraisers are using current comps. These easements are required for the project. The MINUTES OF THE MISSION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE April 3, 2013 history of right-of-way along Johnson Drive was discussed. Councilmember Vandenberg stated that during a recent Ward II meeting, some attendees were concerned with the elimination of the traffic signal at Johnson Drive and Woodson. He described issues with pulling out onto Johnson Drive without a gap in traffic due to this signal, and issues with pedestrians trying to cross Johnson Drive. He stated that he would like to see this light put back in the design of this project. Councilmember Andre stated that he understands concerns with elimination of this signal, but that the new engineering/design of the street will naturally help to slow traffic. Mr. Pregont stated that there will be a flashing pedestrian crossing at Woodson, as well as an elevation in pavement at the intersection which will also help to slow traffic. This item was for discussion only and no action was taken. Meeting Close There being no further business to come before the Committee, the meeting of the Community Development Committee adjourned at 7:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Martha Sum rall City Clerk